Saudi Carbon Monitoring

GHG Inventory Verification Preparation Saudi Arabia

Measurement-led support across Saudi Arabia

This GHG inventory verification checklist helps organisations in Saudi Arabia, with support from Saudi Carbon Monitoring, organise boundaries, methods, source evidence, calculations and management approvals before an independent verifier begins. Independent verification is not a final proofreading step: the verifier examines whether the GHG statement is supported by criteria, evidence and controls, so preparation should begin while data owners can still retrieve records and explain changes.

You receive a written readiness plan setting out the evidence index, boundary file, gap log, scope and price. Request a quotation

The reporting framework, assurance engagement and verifier competence remain specific to the organisation and appointment. Readiness support does not replace independent verification: the verifier alone determines the conclusion, and nobody can promise or manufacture a preferred one.

GHG inventory verification checklist: confirm criteria and scope

Document the reporting framework, organisational and operational boundaries, period, base year, greenhouse gases, calculation methods, factor sources, materiality and intended level of assurance. The independent verifier confirms its own engagement criteria and procedures.

If the organisation used external support to prepare the inventory, state that role clearly. Preparation and independent verification should not be presented as the same service.

Create a boundary and change file

Retain legal entity and facility lists, consolidation decisions, acquisitions, disposals, expansions, closures and methodology changes. Explain exclusions. If prior periods or the base year were recalculated, show why and how.

GHG inventory verification readiness

Build an evidence index

For every material total, link the reported value to calculation, factors, activity data and source documents. Evidence may include invoices, meter exports, production reports, refrigerant logs, source tests, LDAR records, supplier submissions and contracts. Record owner, period, version and location.

Keep raw and processed data. A verifier may need to see how imports, conversions and manual adjustments changed the value. Secure access and confidentiality can be managed without losing traceability.

Reproduce sample calculations

Select several sites and source categories. Start with the report and trace backward to source, then recalculate forward. Check units, factors, formula ranges, duplicates, missing periods, approvals and consistency with the method. Reconcile against finance or operations where appropriate.

Resolve or disclose gaps

Maintain a gap and estimate log with significance, method, owner and improvement plan. Do not hide unresolved issues. Management should decide whether to correct, disclose or accept a limitation before the verifier reports.

Manage requests and corrections

Use one request tracker with owner, due date, evidence supplied and status. When a correction is made, preserve the old value, reason, approval and affected outputs. Update totals consistently and notify the verifier.

The verification-readiness service can organise these controls.

Run a readiness meeting by source category

Bring data owners, the inventory preparer and governance lead together. Review these categories in turn:

For each, confirm source systems, evidence location, estimates, reviewer and open issue. Give high-risk items a responsible owner and closure date.

Then test the request process. Ask someone unfamiliar with the workbook to retrieve and reproduce selected values using only the index and method notes. Record where file names, permissions, units or factor citations fail. Correct the system, not just the sampled number.

Protect verifier independence

The organisation can prepare clear explanations and retrieve evidence promptly, but it should not ask the verifier to design the inventory it will assure. Agree secure access and a request tracker. Keep all corrections visible and reissue affected totals through approval. If the verifier identifies a limitation, management decides how to correct or disclose it. We coordinate responses and evidence retrieval; the conclusion remains the verifier’s.

Prepare the management representation process

The verifier may request representations from management about responsibility, completeness or disclosed matters. The exact wording belongs to the verifier and applicable engagement. Internally, make sure authorised management understands the boundary, significant estimates, changes, uncorrected items and controls before it signs anything.

Hold a closing-readiness review with preparers and data owners. Confirm that all corrections have flowed through tables, narrative and evidence indexes. Lock the submitted version and record the date. If new information emerges, use the agreed change process and notify the verifier rather than maintaining an unofficial parallel result.

Verification readiness is complete when the organisation can explain and evidence its inventory—not when a folder merely contains many files.

Use one controlled contact for verifier requests so site teams do not send inconsistent working files. Every response should reference the evidence index and issued inventory version. This simple discipline protects confidentiality, reduces duplication and keeps corrections visible across the engagement.

Frequently asked questions

Who provides GHG inventory verification preparation in Saudi Arabia?

Saudi Carbon Monitoring provides the preparation: boundary and change file, evidence index, sample-trace checks and gap log. The independent verifier is appointed by the reporting organisation and is not part of our scope.

Who appoints the verifier, and can the verifier help build the inventory?

The reporting organisation appoints a qualified independent verifier under the applicable requirements and governance. Independence rules constrain assistance, so confirm permitted activities directly with the verifier and applicable standard.

What should a GHG inventory verification checklist cover, and what delays it?

Unclear boundaries, inaccessible evidence, factor versions, undocumented overrides, missing approvals and inconsistent site data commonly delay work.

Should estimates be removed before verification?

Not necessarily. Use approved methods and disclose them. The verifier evaluates significance and evidence.

Does a prior verification or readiness support guarantee the next result?

No. Boundaries, data, methods and controls can change, and each engagement reaches its own conclusion. Readiness support improves organisation and resolves gaps, but the independent verifier alone determines the conclusion.

What affects the cost of verification preparation?

Cost depends on the number of sites and source categories, the state of the evidence and calculations, the number of gaps to resolve and the verifier’s request volume. Your quotation sets out the scope and price.

How long does verification preparation take?

Timing depends on inventory size, data availability, how many gaps need closing and the verifier’s schedule. The programme is set out in your quotation.

Saudi Carbon Monitoring serves projects across Saudi Arabia, including Dammam, Al Khobar, Jubail, Riyadh, Jeddah, NEOM and Qiddiya.

Request a quotation

To work through a GHG inventory verification checklist for your organisation, send us your inventory scope, reporting period and verifier timetable, and Saudi Carbon Monitoring will prepare the scope and price. Request a quotation

Start with a defined scope

Tell Saudi Carbon Monitoring about the sources, records and decision in scope.

Request a quotation